[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:07:09 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/47.0.2526.73 Safari/537.36 OPR/34.0.2036.25 |
Follow-up Comment #13, bug #46771 (project octave):
The decoding was fixed by adding following lines to the end of decoding_table
in file cp1252.py:
'u23a1' # 0x5B -> LEFT SQUARE BRACKET
'u23a2' # 0x7C -> VERTICAL LINE
'u23a3' # 0x5B -> LEFT SQUARE BRACKET
'u23a4' # 0x5D -> RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET
'u23a5' # 0x7C -> VERTICAL LINE
'u23a6' # 0x5D -> RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET
'u22c5' # 0x2A -> ASTERISK
However, all encoding errors, for example for
int(f,x)
.
'charmap' codec can't encode characters in position 196-197: character maps to
<undefined>
.
continued. And the encoding possibly should be unique (?) not including
several alternatives. I don't know if these fixes are correct (of course more
precise character to character matching is clearly necessary). There are
ASCII-characters xC4 and xC5 both defined in decoding_table (and thus in
encoding_table also, i suppose) but still error is that they are "undefined".
I tested that these xC4 and xC5 characters function expectedly in octave and
in python without any errors.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46771>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, Doug Stewart, 2016/01/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, Colin Macdonald, 2016/01/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails,
anonymous <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, Colin Macdonald, 2016/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, Philip Nienhuis, 2016/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, Colin Macdonald, 2016/01/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46771] symbolic/sympy oct-package fails, anonymous, 2016/01/06