[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long e
From: |
Jari-Pekka Ikonen |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:45:17 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/47.0.2526.73 Safari/537.36 OPR/34.0.2036.25 |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #46841 (project octave):
Also for a single symbol definition:
/
>> x=sym('x')
OctSymPy v2.2.4: this is free software without warranty, see source.
Initializing communication with SymPy using a popen2() pipe.
Detected Windows: using "winwrapy.bat" to workaround Octave bug #43036
Some output from the Python subprocess (pid 15312) might appear next.
Technical details: fin = 4, fout = 3, pid = 15312.
Waiting......................warning: readblock: timeout of 30 exceeded,
breaking out
warning: called from
readblock at line 83 column 7
python_ipc_popen2 at line 77 column 14
python_ipc_driver at line 30 column 13
python_cmd at line 138 column 9
sym at line 361 column 5
no output so far
err:
1
out:
nFAILED TIMEOUTn
error: ipc_popen2: something wrong? timed out starting python
error: called from
python_ipc_popen2 at line 79 column 7
python_ipc_driver at line 30 column 13
python_cmd at line 138 column 9
sym at line 361 column 5
>>
/
What other information I can find for you? Variables err and out were
displayed when calling readblock. Other things are not so easy to test as
symbols are not available. Maybe some debug printing?
The error is the same independent of whether python console is running at the
same time, as expected I suppose.
Is there a minimum memory limit using python in this? Or is my installation
(Windows, octave, python, sympy) lacking something? Should I have all other
packages also installed?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46841>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Jari-Pekka Ikonen, 2016/01/07
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Colin Macdonald, 2016/01/07
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2016/01/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Jari-Pekka Ikonen, 2016/01/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions,
Jari-Pekka Ikonen <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Jari-Pekka Ikonen, 2016/01/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Jari-Pekka Ikonen, 2016/01/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Jari-Pekka Ikonen, 2016/01/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Jari-Pekka Ikonen, 2016/01/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Colin Macdonald, 2016/01/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46841] Symbolic package subs fails for long expressions, Pantxo Diribarne, 2016/01/22