[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48836] Kill Process Works only for Smaller Pr
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48836] Kill Process Works only for Smaller Processes. What about Larger ones? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:33:25 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/52.0.2743.116 Safari/537.36 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48836>
Summary: Kill Process Works only for Smaller Processes. What
about Larger ones?
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Sat 20 Aug 2016 04:33:22 PM UTC
Category: Performance
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Performance
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name: Amanda
Originator Email: address@hidden
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 4.0.3
Operating System: Microsoft Windows
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Hello. I've run my algorithm for a few iterations (maybe about 200) with
O(160^3), I can use CTRL+C just fine. But, when I run the method for longer
(I'm trying to do about 1000 iterates), the CTRL+C isn't working.
I've tested the algorithm for one iterate at a time. It's about 1 second
long. I predicted it only taking 40 minutes. I don't understand why Octave
is taking longer... or perhaps freezing when I use an outer loop to do the
algorithm 1000 times.
I'm using Windows 7. Can anyone please help.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48836>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48836] Kill Process Works only for Smaller Processes. What about Larger ones?,
anonymous <=