[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__
From: |
Ernst Reissner |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__ |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:42:42 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0 |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #48866 (project octave):
Hm,...
you would write code using __java_get__?
Which means that you use private??
Now I understand why you reject my fix. ;-)
Now let us be serious again:
What do you mean by
'The only reason for keeping the wrappers java_get and java_set is for
backwards compatibility with the old Java Forge package. '?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48866>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__, Ernst Reissner, 2016/08/23
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__, Ernst Reissner, 2016/08/23
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__, Philip Nienhuis, 2016/08/23
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__, Mike Miller, 2016/08/23
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__, Ernst Reissner, 2016/08/23
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__, Ernst Reissner, 2016/08/23
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__, Mike Miller, 2016/08/23
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__,
Ernst Reissner <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48866] __java_get/set__, Ernst Reissner, 2016/08/23