[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routi
From: |
Markus Mützel |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:47:09 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 |
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #48873 (project octave):
To be honest, I do not understand what Matlab is doing. According to [1], I
think we are doing the correct thing.
If I understand the following sentences correctly, it should not matter in
which direction the surface normals are pointed when "BackFaceLighting" is set
to "reverselit":
Face lighting when the vertex normals point away from camera, specified as one
of these values:
'reverselit' — Light the face as if the vertex normal pointed towards the
camera.
This is what is done in Octave: Normals pointing away from the camera are
reversed.
Additionally, I cannot see any visual difference between "lit" and "unlit" in
Matlab [2]. According to [1], there should be a difference:
'unlit' — Do not light the face.
'lit' — Light the face according to the vertex normal.
Those short sentences seemed easy enough to understand correctly when I first
read them. I might have misunderstood them anyway. Can someone help me out,
what else could be meant?
[1]
http://de.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/primitivesurface-properties.html#property_backfacelighting
[2] http://josoansi.de/octave_plot_compare/compare_plot_demos_04.html#light_08
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48873>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Rik, 2016/08/23
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Rik, 2016/08/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos,
Markus Mützel <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Rik, 2016/08/24
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Pantxo Diribarne, 2016/08/26
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Rik, 2016/08/26
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Rik, 2016/08/26
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Markus Mützel, 2016/08/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Markus Mützel, 2016/08/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Rik, 2016/08/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Rik, 2016/08/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Pantxo Diribarne, 2016/08/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48873] Matlab incompatibilities in plot routines revealed through dump_plot_demos, Rik, 2016/08/30