[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #50426] perms() sort order different than Matlab

[Mike Miller]

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #50426 (project octave):

So this could be solved with a simple change


  A = sortrows (v(p), -(1:n));


which seems to work for me but is likely less efficient.

Or by lexicographically sorting the input vector first, which should be more
efficient, and figuring out how to adjust the loop index construction logic to
ensure that it produces the permutations of v in the right order.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50426>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/