[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect de
From: |
Joel Dahne |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:36:19 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51783>
Summary: [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for
factorial
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: urathai
Submitted on: Fri 18 Aug 2017 07:36:18 AM UTC
Category: Octave Forge Package
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Incorrect Result
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: other
Operating System: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
The factorial function at best gives the decoration "dac", a comment in the
code says that this is because it is not continuous.
First of all, if we say that the factorial is not continuous it should at best
have the decoration "def". The difference between "com" and "dac" is that
"dac" can be unbounded, this is clearly not the problem for the factorial in
general.
Secondly I would argue that the factorial is in fact continuous. The
requirements for "dac" is from the documentation
x is a nonempty subset of Dom(f); and the restriction of f to x is continuous
Since the domain of the factorial is exactly the natural numbers it is
continuous (the natural numbers have the discrete topology so every function
is continuous). So the decoration should be "com" in general.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51783>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial,
Joel Dahne <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial, anonymous, 2017/08/18
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial, Joel Dahne, 2017/08/18
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial, Oliver Heimlich, 2017/08/18
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial, Joel Dahne, 2017/08/18
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial, Joel Dahne, 2017/08/19
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial, Oliver Heimlich, 2017/08/19
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51783] [octave forge] (interval) incorrect decoration for factorial, Markus Mützel, 2017/08/20