octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51888] scanf / fscanf / sscanf should be able


From: Mike Miller
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51888] scanf / fscanf / sscanf should be able to return int64 / unit64 values
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:16:59 -0400 (EDT)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51888>

                 Summary: scanf / fscanf / sscanf should be able to return
int64 / unit64 values
                 Project: GNU Octave
            Submitted by: mtmiller
            Submitted on: Tue 29 Aug 2017 11:16:58 AM PDT
                Category: Octave Function
                Severity: 1 - Wish
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Matlab Compatibility
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: 
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
                 Release: dev
        Operating System: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

According to Matlab's docs for fscanf and sscanf, if the format string
conversions are all signed 64-bit integer conversions ("%ld" or "%li"), then
the return value should be a int64-valued array. If the format string is
entirely unsigned 64-bit conversions ("%lo", "%lu", or "%lx"), then the return
value should be a uint64-valued array.

This was discussed and confirmed in bug #47741, but a new bug was never filed
for this remaining outstanding compatibility issue.

We might want to extend this to also cover the Octave scanf extension using
the "C" option, which uses a different code base for its conversions.




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51888>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]