[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] chop behaves differently from document
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] chop behaves differently from documentation |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:30:23 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0 |
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #52787 (project octave):
I've added jwe to the CC list for this bug. The remaining issue is with
chop.m. I'm not sure if the best course of action is to modify how chop
behaves, or to document the difference in behavior between 2 and 3 input
arguments.
Also, this function was added by jwe back in 2010, but I don't see it used in
any of the current m-files in scripts, nor is it a Matlab function. Maybe it
should just be deprecated and removed.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52787>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] Arithmetic functions cumsum, chop, primes behave slight differently from document, anonymous, 2018/01/02
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] Arithmetic functions cumsum, chop, primes behave slight differently from document, anonymous, 2018/01/02
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] Arithmetic functions cumsum, chop, primes behave slight differently from document, Sahil Yadav, 2018/01/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] Arithmetic functions cumsum, chop, primes behave slight differently from document, Rik, 2018/01/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] chop behaves differently from documentation, Rik, 2018/01/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] chop behaves differently from documentation,
Rik <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] chop behaves differently from documentation, John W. Eaton, 2018/01/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52787] chop behaves differently from documentation, Rik, 2018/01/04