[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21 |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jan 2018 02:37:34 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52814>
Summary: some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Fri 05 Jan 2018 07:37:33 AM UTC
Category: Documentation
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Documentation
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email: address@hidden
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 4.2.1
Operating System: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
It looks that there are many bugreports and changesets recently...
I directly put a possible patch here for maintainers convenience:
--- a/doc/interpreter/diagperm.txi
+++ b/doc/interpreter/diagperm.txi
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
then @code{D*M} is equivalent to
@example
-[D(1:n,n) * M; zeros(m-n, columns (M))],
+[D(1:n,:) * M; zeros(m-n, columns (M))],
@end example
@noindent
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@
@example
@group
[L, U, P] = lu (A); ## now L*U = P*A
- x = U \ L \ P*b;
+ x = U \ (L \ P)*b;
@end group
@end example
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@
The primary distinction is that an assumed zero, when multiplied
by any number, or divided by any nonzero number,
-yields *always* a zero, even when, e.g., multiplied by @code{Inf}
+yields @strong{always} a zero, even when, e.g., multiplied by @code{Inf}
or divided by @code{NaN}.
The reason for this behavior is that the numerical multiplication is not
actually performed anywhere by the underlying algorithm; the result is
An explanation about the 2nd change:
the following equivalent expressions are all wrong
x = U \ L \ P * b
x = (U \ L) \ P * b
x = (U \ L \ P) * b
x = inv(inv(U) * L) * P * b
the following equivalent expressions are all right
x = U \ (L \ P) * b
x = U \ (L \ P * b)
x = inv(U) * inv(L) * P * b
these can be verified directly in Octave such as
A = randn(5);
b = randn(5,1);
x = A \ b;
[L, U, P] = lu (A);
L*U - P*A ## L*U == P*A
x - U \ (L \ P)*b ## x == U \ (L \ P)*b
x - U \ L \ P*b ## x != U \ L \ P*b
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52814>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21,
anonymous <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21, anonymous, 2018/01/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21, Rik, 2018/01/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21, anonymous, 2018/01/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21, Michael Godfrey, 2018/01/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21, Michael Godfrey, 2018/01/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21, Rik, 2018/01/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21, Rik, 2018/01/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52814] some obvious bugs in document Chapter 21, Michael Godfrey, 2018/01/08