[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to p
From: |
Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:33:51 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0 |
Follow-up Comment #40, bug #53186 (project octave):
If you look at buildbots this failure test
>>>>> processing
/home/buildbotu/fc25-x86_64/gcc-lto-fedora/src/scripts/image/getframe.m
***** testif HAVE_QOFFSCREENSURFACE
hf = figure ("visible", "off");
unwind_protect
pos = get (hf, "position");
assert (size (getframe (hf).cdata)(1:2), pos(4:-1:3));
unwind_protect_cleanup
close (hf);
end_unwind_protect
!!!!! test failed
ASSERT errors for: assert (size (getframe (hf).cdata) (1:2),pos (4:-1:3))
Location | Observed | Expected | Reason
(1) 0 420 Abs err 420 exceeds tol 0 by 4e+02
(2) 0 560 Abs err 560 exceeds tol 0 by 6e+02
happens quite often.
LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 perhaps make it worse (more often).
I was able to reproduce on a desktop getting about 2 failures per
1000 repeats. On buildbots it happens more often.
I wonder if there is some race condition going on (e.g. figure() does not have
enough time to setup properties which are getting read by get())...
In any case it does not look like a high priority issue, but the problem is
there.
Dmitri.
--
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53186>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Rik, 2018/03/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Dan Sebald, 2018/03/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Mike Miller, 2018/03/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Pantxo Diribarne, 2018/03/02
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2018/03/02
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Pantxo Diribarne, 2018/03/02
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2018/03/02
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2018/03/02
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, ederag, 2018/03/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures,
Dmitri A. Sergatskov <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Rik, 2018/03/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Pantxo Diribarne, 2018/03/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2018/03/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Mike Miller, 2018/03/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53186] Without osmesa it is not possible to print/getframe invisible figures, Pantxo Diribarne, 2018/03/12