[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] angle(0+xi) producing inaccurate resul
From: |
Dildar Sk |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] angle(0+xi) producing inaccurate result. |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Mar 2018 11:31:34 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/65.0.3325.181 Safari/537.36 |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #53462 (project octave):
"What happens for you if you do",
angle (complex (0, Inf))
angle (complex (NaN, Inf))
angle (complex (Inf, NaN))
angle (complex (NaN, NaN))
angle (complex (Inf, Inf))
Yes,the results are same in MATLAB and Octave.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53462>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] angle(0+xi) producing inaccurate result., Dildar Sk, 2018/03/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] angle(0+xi) producing inaccurate result., Dildar Sk, 2018/03/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] angle(0+xi) producing inaccurate result., John W. Eaton, 2018/03/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] angle(0+xi) producing inaccurate result., John W. Eaton, 2018/03/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] angle(0+xi) producing inaccurate result.,
Dildar Sk <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] Inf*i is not equivalent to complex(0, Inf), Mike Miller, 2018/03/26
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] Inf*i is not equivalent to complex(0, Inf), Mike Miller, 2018/03/26
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] Inf*i is not equivalent to complex(0, Inf), Mike Miller, 2018/03/26
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] Inf*i is not equivalent to complex(0, Inf), Rik, 2018/03/26
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53462] Inf*i is not equivalent to complex(0, Inf), Mike Miller, 2018/03/26