[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53612] gammainc fails one test with "upper" f
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53612] gammainc fails one test with "upper" flag and complex input |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:22:55 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53612>
Summary: gammainc fails one test with "upper" flag and
complex input
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: rik5
Submitted on: Wed 11 Apr 2018 11:22:53 AM PDT
Category: Test Suite
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Inaccurate Result
Status: Confirmed
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 4.3.90
Operating System: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
The following test is failing
%! assert (gammainc (-20, 1.1, "upper"), ...
%! 6.50986687074979e8 + 2.11518396291149e8*i, -1e-13);
On my system, the result is
***** xtest
assert (gammainc (-20, 1.1, "upper"), ...
6.50986687074979e8 + 2.11518396291149e8*i, -1e-13);
!!!!! known failure
ASSERT errors for: assert (gammainc (-20, 1.1, "upper"),6.50986687074979e8 +
2.11518396291149e8 * i,-1e-13)
Location | Observed | Expected | Reason
() 650986687.1916+211518396.654i 650986687.075+211518396.2911i Rel
err 5.5676e-10 exceeds tol 1e-13 by 6e-10
I don't know if the tolerance should be relaxed, or the algorithm within
gammainc should be improved.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53612>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53612] gammainc fails one test with "upper" flag and complex input,
Rik <=