[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Question
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Question |
Date: |
Fri, 15 May 1998 16:28:17 -0500 (CDT) |
On 15-May-1998, Chuck Robey <address@hidden> wrote:
| I just got around to actually running a new octave script on my newly
| ported 2.0.12, and I saw it was core-dumping on startup. The specific
| point it core-dumps (with a bus error) on is in the GNU stdc++ header
| file bastring.h, line 69:
|
| charT* data () { return reinterpret_cast<charT *>(this + 1); }
| charT& operator[] (size_t s) { return data () [s]; }
| charT* grab () { if (selfish) return clone (); ++ref; return data (); }
| void release () { if (--ref == 0) delete this; } <== HERE
|
| inline static void * operator new (size_t, size_t);
| inline static Rep* create (size_t);
|
| This seems to me to be kicked off from octave.cc line 414, where:
|
| initialize_error_handlers ();
|
| initialize_globals (argv[0]); <== HERE
|
| initialize_pathsearch ();
|
| initialize_globals is supposed to be called with a string class
| argument, not just any string, isn't it? You're casting argv[0] as a
| class string, but it's a simple C string, right? I'm not totally at
| home with c++, so I can't be trusted on this, but it seems you want a
| constructor here ... I did check, and argv[0] is a pointer to a good
| full octave path.
The compiler is supposed to insert the string constructor
automatically. I'd suspect that at least that part is correct.
| I can and will perform any tests you can imagine, and would in fact be
| pleased to work off any guesses you can come up with. The platform is
| FreeBSD-current, using gcc 2.7.2.1.
My guess is that the copy of libstdc++ you have is out of sync with
the version of the compiler or include files that you used to build
Octave.
jwe
- Question, Chuck Robey, 1998/05/15
- Question,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Question, Chuck Robey, 1998/05/15
- Re: Question, John W. Eaton, 1998/05/15
- Re: Question, Chuck Robey, 1998/05/16
- Re: Question, John W. Eaton, 1998/05/16
- Re: Question, Chuck Robey, 1998/05/16
- Re: Question, Chuck Robey, 1998/05/19
- Re: Question, John W. Eaton, 1998/05/19
- Re: Question, Chuck Robey, 1998/05/19
- Re: Question, Chuck Robey, 1998/05/19