patch : [...] = leval(name, list)

[Etienne Grossmann]

  Hello,

  I got convinced that a function [...] = leval(name, list) offers
more flexibility than [...] = feval(name, arg1,...,argn). For example,
such a function is useful for minimization of a function that takes
many arguments.

  I first implemented it as a leval.m which works fine, but puts an
overhead of ~4ms (PII,350MHz), which I think is too much (there may be
hundreds of calls to it).

  It turns out that "leval" is very simple to implement as a built-in:
see the patch (against 2.1.32) below. It works fine : I append a test
script too. Run it after setting "verbose=1".

  Does that patch meet the coding standards?

  Etienne


======================================================================

parse.leval.patch
Description: Binary data

======================================================================

test_leval.m
Description: Binary data