[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISO C++ and Octave
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: ISO C++ and Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:49:28 -0600 |
On 31-Jan-2001, Mumit Khan <address@hidden> wrote:
| Here's the config patch for checking for ISO-C++ compliant library. It's
| extremely naive, but it's a start. I use it for a variety of reasonable
| compilers (KAI, Sun Forte, and a few other EDG derived ones), and it
| does the job for me. I need numeric_limits<> in my numerical code, and
| I check for the explicitly. Octave doesn't need anything special here.
OK, I included this patch, in case we need it.
Thanks,
jwe
- ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30
- ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/30
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Patch [Re: ISO C++ and Octave], Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30