octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: benchmarks - sort


From: Schloegl Alois
Subject: Re: benchmarks - sort
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 02:28:12 +0100
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs


My previous mail was not ready to go.
Please, ignore  the last sentence, it was not intended.


I wanted to conclude that:
- the algorithm should be of order O(n.log(n))
    here a different algorithm might be needed
- and the comparison operator should be as fast and simple as possible
    here the 2-step approach as outlined in the previous mail could help.



Alois














reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]