Re: Working patch for FFTW 3.0.x and Nd FFT's

[John W. Eaton]

On 17-Feb-2004, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:

| According to John W. Eaton <address@hidden> (on 02/16/04):
| 
| > Thanks for being careful to include OCTAVE_QUIT in most loops so that
| > Octave can be interrupted when these calculations are happening.  I
| > did notice that the function convert_packcomplex_1d and
| > convert_packcomplex_Nd contain loops and do not use OCTAVE_QUIT.  Is
| > that intentional?  Is that code so simple that it can never run for a
| > long time, even if a user accidentally passes in a very large array?
| 
| That is more of an oversight. Feel free to add the OCTAVE_QUITs there

I'm not sure of the best locations for them since I don't know the
typical sizes of the data.  Should they always go inside the innermost
loops?

jwe