Re: Working patch for FFTW 3.0.x and Nd FFT's

[Dmitri A. Sergatskov]

David Bateman wrote:

> > Why not the name fft_wisdom as opposed to fftw_wisdom?  I realize that 
> > FFTW is being used, but if later some other FFT package is used then 
> > fft_wisdom could still apply.  (I may have come in late on this discussion.)
>
>
> My original patch had fft_wisdom, John preferred fftw_wisdom. He has CVS
> write access, so he has the last say :-)

I do not know what was John reasonings, but since 'wisdom' is the FFTW3.x 
peculiarity
it make sense (to me) to keep the reference in the name.

> D.

Dmitri.