[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.1.61?
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: 2.1.61? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 17:40:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Daprès John W. Eaton <address@hidden> (le 05/11/2004):
> Unless anyone has objections, I'm planning to make the 2.1.61 snapshot
> today. There are a couple of things I'd still like to add, but they
> may take some time and I think a new snapshot with all the recent bug
> fixes is more important. Does anyone know of any bugs that remain and
> are critical to fix before I make a new snapshot?
>
> The two things I know about are:
>
> * Comparison operations for 64-bit integers will not work correctly
> for large values (> 2^53) because we are converting to double to
> do the conversions.
>
> * Things like [int32(1), int16(1)] will fail. Concatenation
> operations like this should return an object of the smaller type
> (int16 in this case).
There was the issue of passing the first arg to the concat function as
non-const so that it could be used direct, like
NDArray
concat (NDArray& ra, const NDArray& rb, const Array<int>& ra_idx)
{
if (rb.numel () > 0)
ra.insert (rb, ra_idx);
return ra;
}
rather than what is current done that makes an unecessary copy. This is
a pretty trival change, which you asked me to do but I haven't had the
time, mainly due to the fact that it implies a complete recompile. Its
probably worth having it for 2.1.61 though, especially if you are going
to call 2.1.61 the testing version.
Regards
David
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola CRM +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- 2.1.61?, John W. Eaton, 2004/11/05
- Re: 2.1.61?,
David Bateman <=