Re: int octave_value::numel (void) const;

[John W. Eaton]

On 17-Nov-2004, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:

| You also need the attached one line patch so that the "end" keyword 
| will work correctly for types where numel() is not the same as
| dims().numel()...

OK, I made this change and added the following comment:

  // We want numel = prod (size ()) here, so dont' use
  // index_object->numel () as that may be different (it is
  // the number of nonzero elements for sparse arrays).

Is that accurate?

Thanks,

jwe