Re: 2.1.64 snapshot soon?

[John W. Eaton]

On  3-Dec-2004, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:

| Daprès John W. Eaton <address@hidden> (le 03/12/2004):
| > I'm preparing to make a 2.1.64 snapshot that will be declared
| > "testing" or "recommended".  There haven't been too many bugs
| > reported, but at least one was fairly serious (the "end" indexing
| > problem for some data types).  I think most problems reported since
| > the 2.1.63 snapshot was made have been fixed.  Is anyone aware of a
| > problem that still needs to be addressed?
| 
| I don't know of any. Though I can't even remember the end indexing bug,
| was that the sscanf bug in
| 
| http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/bug-octave/2004/861

No, it was this problem:

  http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/octave-maintainers/2004/877

The sscanf problem was really an indexing problem, but at least it was
not a regression for valid input...

In any case, I think both have been fixed.

jwe