Re: Report on progress...

[Daniel J Sebald]

Daniel J Sebald wrote:
> address@hidden wrote:
>
> I note an improved performance in speed for some intensive number 
> crunching.
> A program to process multichannel data has gone from:
>
> with 2.1.64
>   textstr = 0, 3.233
>   textstr = 1, 88.33
>   textstr = 2, 171.8
>
> with 2.1.65
>   textstr = 0, 3.226
>   textstr = 1, 64.41
>   textstr = 2, 123.9

Hmm, I recompiled Octave with the --enable-shared option to include OctaveForge and I'm back to the 
original numbers:

with 2.1.65 and --enable-shared
  textstr = 0, 3.676
  textstr = 1, 86.18
  textstr = 2, 166.4

Does Octave slow down with shared libraries?  Probably so, but 30%?

Dan