Re: Cell support for deblank

[Keith Goodman]

Understood. But a "which -all" is still very useful if anyone feels
like making one.

On 6/7/05, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Keith Goodman wrote:
> 
> >On 6/7/05, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>cellfun is part of 2.9.x, in fact looking at
> >>
> >>http://www.octave.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/octave/src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/cellfun.cc?rev=1.2&sortby=date&view=log
> >>
> >>it has been present since the 2.9.0 tagged version...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >In that case, a "which -all" would be useful.
> >
> >
> >
> >>>which cellfun
> >>>
> >>>
> >cellfun is the dynamically-linked function from the file
> >/usr/local/libexec/octave/2.9.3/site/oct/i686-pc-linux-gnu/octave-forge/cellfun.oct
> >
> >
> >
> The octave-forge version comes first in your path. Some of the
> octave-forge stuff is set to not build it it also existing in octave
> (bitand, etc), but not cellfun.cc.. Basically there'll be one more 2.1.x
> release of octave-forge and then all of the common stuff will be
> stripped and octave-forge simplified.. So there is no point in
> addressing this issue...
> 
> D.
> 
> --
> David Bateman                                address@hidden
> Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
> Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
> 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE
> 
> The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
> 
> [x] General Business Information
> [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
> [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
> 
>