[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: packaging system

From: Stefan van der Walt
Subject: Re: packaging system
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:35:06 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

I still think that something like a pre- and post-install script would
be useful.  Why stop at being able to modify the installation prefix?
Why not create a standard structure with all installation variables,
populated before installation starts.

The installing package then has an opportunity to modify this struct
in the pre-install script after which installation takes place.
Afterwards, the post-install script can do any additional
admin/cleanup needed while having access to that information still.

Your package has everything in place to do this already.  It would
just require some minor modifications.


On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:01:35PM +0200, S?ren Hauberg wrote:
> Hi
> I've updated the code (it's still at http://hauberg.org/octave-package), 
> with the following changes:
> *) If the archive contains a directory, cd to that directory. This means 
> that package can keep it's files in a directory (e.g. PACKAGE-VERSION).
> *) A bit more error checking. Not enough though
> *) Support for uninstallation of packages. No dependency checking is 
> done during uninstallation.
> *) The installation prefix is defined by the global variable 
> OCTAVE_PACKAGE_PREFIX. If this variable is not defined an error is 
> issued. Packages will be install in OCTAVE_VALUE_PREFIX/PACKAGE-VERSION
> As long as the packages doesn't have to many errors the code is usable 
> in it's current state.
> /Søren

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]