[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: packaging system
From: |
Stefan van der Walt |
Subject: |
Re: packaging system |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:57:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 11:41:50AM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 18-Jun-2005, Søren Hauberg wrote:
>
> | So the question is, to which extend should packages and toolboxes
> | differ? Do we need toolboxes if we have packages?
>
> I don't see why we would.
So, you'd like to limit a package to one toolbox? That doesn't make
sense to me.
Regards
Stefan
- Re: packaging system, (continued)
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, John W. Eaton, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system,
Stefan van der Walt <=
- Re: packaging system, John W. Eaton, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/19
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/19
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/19
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/19
- Re: packaging system, Bill Denney, 2005/06/19
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/20
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/20
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/20