[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions
From: |
Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:27:19 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020 |
John Swensen wrote:
I actually like this one, except maybe only have one of them for the
sake of being able to see them when they are small. Also, I wasn't sure
if your intent was to make the 8/infinity symbol also be a Mobius strip,
but I think it would be cool to make that more apparent.
I thought Lee was just showing the image at different sizes as was done with
the previous example. But now I'm not sure. Lee, you weren't attempting an
*infinite* series with each successive image scaled *1/2* the size of the
previous (an Octave), were you? :-)
Anyway, I wasn't thinking Mobius strip. Even still, I'm not sure a Mobius
strip could be viewed at an angle to cause a figure eight shape. Here's some
pictures of a Lorenz attractor with different parameter settings. (Its a 3
variable state equation, so needs the right viewing angle.)
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/fractals/lorenz/
Dan
- Fwd: Logo conclusions, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Fwd: Logo conclusions, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, John W. Eaton, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Lee Olson, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, John Swensen, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, kraiskil, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions,
Daniel J Sebald <=
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Lee Olson, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Bill Denney, 2006/02/25
- Re: Logo conclusions, Dr. A S Hodel, 2006/02/26