Re: MinGW version binary gobbledygook error messages?

[David Bateman]

Sebastien Loisel wrote:

>     1) The error messages are goobledegook sometimes in MinGW. Once they
>     change to goobledegook they stay that way. Ideas?
>
>
> I'll keep my eyes peeled for it and indeed it will need to be fixed at 
> some point, but it's not so easy for me to debug. My struggles with 
> command_editor are much more pressing (and might I add, unanswered!)
>
> You've pointed out to me several times that eval_string() isn't the 
> right way of doing things. I've been wanting to change to 
> command_editor, but the class is large and I don't understand it. 
> Where do I start?
>
> Sébastien Loisel
I'm much more comfortable in the numeric classes of octave than the 
parser, which I've never fully understood either.. John or Paul probably 
know more than I do, though I fear given your goal of an IDE, you'll 
soon be the expert on this part of octave :-)

D.

--
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary