[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5
From: |
Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: |
Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5 |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:13:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020 |
I've upgraded from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5 and notice a couple things so far:
1) What I used to use in 2.1.65 is:
[output,status] = system([gnuplot_binary " --version"]);
and I've had to switch that to:
[status,output] = system([gnuplot_binary " --version"]);
in 2.9.5. The documentation still reads:
The `system' function can return two values. The first is the
exit status of the command and the second is any output from the
command that was written to the standard output stream. For
example,
[output, status] = system ("echo foo; exit 2");
will set the variable `output' to the string `foo', and the
variable `status' to the integer `2'.
2) In something like sprintf('e\n') the '\n' is interpretted correctly.
However, in __gnuplot_raw('e\n') the escape character is treated as '\' and
'n'. (I assume it was desired to behave that way.)
Dan
- Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5,
Daniel J Sebald <=
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Bill Denney, 2006/04/15
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Bill Denney, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Søren Hauberg, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, John W. Eaton, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Rafael Laboissiere, 2006/04/22