octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Matrix.h vs. matrix.h saga continued


From: Joe Koski
Subject: Re: Matrix.h vs. matrix.h saga continued
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:48:13 -0600
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620



on 7/31/06 2:25 PM, Quentin Spencer at address@hidden wrote:

> Joe Koski wrote:
>> John, et al,
>> 
>> As John probably suspected, we may not be free of problems associated with
>> matrix.h vs. Matrix.h with Mac OS X.
>> 
>> First, in another exercise, I upgraded to gsl-1.8 and built, tested and
>> installed it. That seems to have solved my gsl problems with octave-forge.
>> 
>> Octave-forge now runs "make check," but with a few test failures.
>> 
>> In the process of the build, I noticed that the octave-forge make file was
>> looking for Matrix.h in /usr/local/include/octave-2.9.7/octave, so I copied
>> Matrix.h from /usr/local/include/octave/Matrix.h down to the
>> octave-2.9.7/octave directory. That satisfied the need for Matrix.h, but now
>> I'm getting errors similar to those encountered with the build of
>> octave-2.9.7: 
>>   
> 
> Since the mex stuff was imported into octave in 2.9.7, if you are
> building octave-forge with octave-2.9.7, you should disable building
> anything in the extra/mex directory, which can be done with "touch
> extra/mex/NOINSTALL".
> 
> Quentin
> 

Quentin,

You are correct, I didn't need to attempt a build of mex from octave-forge.
Sorry. I'll do what you suggest, if necesssary, with my next octave-forge
build. Thanks.

Joe




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]