[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Matrix.h vs. matrix.h saga continued
From: |
Joe Koski |
Subject: |
Re: Matrix.h vs. matrix.h saga continued |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:48:13 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
on 7/31/06 2:25 PM, Quentin Spencer at address@hidden wrote:
> Joe Koski wrote:
>> John, et al,
>>
>> As John probably suspected, we may not be free of problems associated with
>> matrix.h vs. Matrix.h with Mac OS X.
>>
>> First, in another exercise, I upgraded to gsl-1.8 and built, tested and
>> installed it. That seems to have solved my gsl problems with octave-forge.
>>
>> Octave-forge now runs "make check," but with a few test failures.
>>
>> In the process of the build, I noticed that the octave-forge make file was
>> looking for Matrix.h in /usr/local/include/octave-2.9.7/octave, so I copied
>> Matrix.h from /usr/local/include/octave/Matrix.h down to the
>> octave-2.9.7/octave directory. That satisfied the need for Matrix.h, but now
>> I'm getting errors similar to those encountered with the build of
>> octave-2.9.7:
>>
>
> Since the mex stuff was imported into octave in 2.9.7, if you are
> building octave-forge with octave-2.9.7, you should disable building
> anything in the extra/mex directory, which can be done with "touch
> extra/mex/NOINSTALL".
>
> Quentin
>
Quentin,
You are correct, I didn't need to attempt a build of mex from octave-forge.
Sorry. I'll do what you suggest, if necesssary, with my next octave-forge
build. Thanks.
Joe