octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave-maintainers Digest, Vol 5, Issue 12


From: Muthiah Annamalai
Subject: Re: Octave-maintainers Digest, Vol 5, Issue 12
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:32:22 -0500

On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 02:34 -0500, address@hidden
wrote:
> Send Octave-maintainers mailing list submissions to
>       address@hidden
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/octave-maintainers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       address@hidden
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       address@hidden
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Octave-maintainers digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m (John W. Eaton)
>    2. Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m (John W. Eaton)
>    3. FW: Seg fault with test_sparse.m (Joe Koski)
>    4. list wanted (Anmol Sethy)
>    5. Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m (David Bateman)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:45:00 -0400
> From: "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m
> To: Joe Koski <address@hidden>
> Cc: octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On 21-Aug-2006, Joe Koski wrote:
> 
> | on 8/21/06 2:30 PM, John W. Eaton at address@hidden wrote:
> | 
> | > On 21-Aug-2006, Joe Koski wrote:
> | > 
> | > | octave:1> testls(0)
> | > | error: max_recursion_limit exceeded
> | > | error: called from `testls' in file
> | > | `/Users/jakoski/Codes/octave_test_files/testls.m'
> | > | error: called from `testls' in file
> | > | `/Users/jakoski/Codes/octave_test_files/testls.m'
> | > 
> | > Save just the function that I sent (not the stuff after the
> | > endfunction line) in a file and then run
> | > 
> | >   [save_status, save_files] = testls (0);
> | >   [load_status, load_files] = testls (1);
> | >  
> | >   for f = [save_files, load_files]
> | >     unlink (f{1});
> | >   endfor
> | > 
> | >   assert (save_status && load_status);
> | > 
> | > and there should be no recursion problem.
> | > 
> | > jwe
> | 
> | John,
> | 
> | Thanks, that solved the recursion problem. I stuck in
> | 
> |     disp('before write')
> |     a14
> |     b14
> | 
> | Immediately after all the b14 = a14, etc.
> | 
> | and 
> | 
> |       disp('after read');
> |       a14
> |       b14
> | 
> | Just before if (a14 != b14)
> | 
> | And got
> | 
> | octave:1> new_test_io
> | before write
> | a14 =
> | 
> |   7  7
> |   5  1
> | 
> | b14 =
> | 
> |   7  7
> |   5  1
> | 
> | after read
> | a14 =
> | 
> |   7  7
> |   5  1
> | 
> | b14 =
> | 
> |   7  7
> |   5  1
> | 
> | after read
> | a14 =
> | 
> |   7  7
> |   5  1
> | 
> | b14 =
> | 
> |   7  7
> |   5  1
> | 
> | after read
> | a14 =
> | 
> |   0  0
> |   0  0
> | 
> | b14 =
> | 
> |   7  7
> |   5  1
> | 
> | So, on the third attempt, it shows zeros in the matrix instead of the
> | correct values. We're getting closer. Now what?
> 
> OK.  I see the bug now, and I don't think it is specific to OS X.
> 
> Also, the checks in test.m should be of the form
> 
>   if (! isequal (a, b))
> 
> or
> 
>   if (! (a == b))
> 
> since
> 
>   if (a != b)
> 
> will only be true if ALL the elements of A and B are not equal.  D'oh,
> that's another gotcha of the "Matlab language".
> 
> jwe
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:37:01 -0400
> From: "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m
> To: Joe Koski <address@hidden>
> Cc: octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On 21-Aug-2006, John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> | On 21-Aug-2006, Joe Koski wrote:
> | 
> | | on 8/21/06 2:30 PM, John W. Eaton at address@hidden wrote:
> | | 
> | | > On 21-Aug-2006, Joe Koski wrote:
> | | > 
> | | > | octave:1> testls(0)
> | | > | error: max_recursion_limit exceeded
> | | > | error: called from `testls' in file
> | | > | `/Users/jakoski/Codes/octave_test_files/testls.m'
> | | > | error: called from `testls' in file
> | | > | `/Users/jakoski/Codes/octave_test_files/testls.m'
> | | > 
> | | > Save just the function that I sent (not the stuff after the
> | | > endfunction line) in a file and then run
> | | > 
> | | >   [save_status, save_files] = testls (0);
> | | >   [load_status, load_files] = testls (1);
> | | >  
> | | >   for f = [save_files, load_files]
> | | >     unlink (f{1});
> | | >   endfor
> | | > 
> | | >   assert (save_status && load_status);
> | | > 
> | | > and there should be no recursion problem.
> | | > 
> | | > jwe
> | | 
> | | John,
> | | 
> | | Thanks, that solved the recursion problem. I stuck in
> | | 
> | |     disp('before write')
> | |     a14
> | |     b14
> | | 
> | | Immediately after all the b14 = a14, etc.
> | | 
> | | and 
> | | 
> | |       disp('after read');
> | |       a14
> | |       b14
> | | 
> | | Just before if (a14 != b14)
> | | 
> | | And got
> | | 
> | | octave:1> new_test_io
> | | before write
> | | a14 =
> | | 
> | |   7  7
> | |   5  1
> | | 
> | | b14 =
> | | 
> | |   7  7
> | |   5  1
> | | 
> | | after read
> | | a14 =
> | | 
> | |   7  7
> | |   5  1
> | | 
> | | b14 =
> | | 
> | |   7  7
> | |   5  1
> | | 
> | | after read
> | | a14 =
> | | 
> | |   7  7
> | |   5  1
> | | 
> | | b14 =
> | | 
> | |   7  7
> | |   5  1
> | | 
> | | after read
> | | a14 =
> | | 
> | |   0  0
> | |   0  0
> | | 
> | | b14 =
> | | 
> | |   7  7
> | |   5  1
> | | 
> | | So, on the third attempt, it shows zeros in the matrix instead of the
> | | correct values. We're getting closer. Now what?
> | 
> | OK.  I see the bug now, and I don't think it is specific to OS X.
> | 
> | Also, the checks in test.m should be of the form
> | 
> |   if (! isequal (a, b))
> | 
> | or
> | 
> |   if (! (a == b))
> | 
> | since
> | 
> |   if (a != b)
> | 
> | will only be true if ALL the elements of A and B are not equal.  D'oh,
> | that's another gotcha of the "Matlab language".
> 
> Please try the follwoing patch to fix the problem with reading/writing
> 64-bit data types in the MAT file format.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jwe
> 
> 
> src/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2006-08-21  John W. Eaton  <address@hidden>
> 
>       * ls-mat5.cc (read_mat5_binary_data, read_mat5_integer_data,
>       write_mat5_array): Unconditionally enable code for 64-bit int types.
> 
>  
> Index: src/ls-mat5.cc
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/octave/src/ls-mat5.cc,v
> retrieving revision 1.35
> diff -u -u -r1.35 ls-mat5.cc
> --- src/ls-mat5.cc    18 Aug 2006 18:05:20 -0000      1.35
> +++ src/ls-mat5.cc    22 Aug 2006 02:35:36 -0000
> @@ -157,16 +157,13 @@
>      case miRESERVE3:
>        break;
>  
> +    // FIXME -- how are the 64-bit cases supposed to work here?
>      case miINT64:
> -#ifdef int64_t
>        read_doubles (is, data, LS_LONG, count, swap, flt_fmt);
> -#endif
>        break;
>  
>      case miUINT64:
> -#ifdef int64_t
>        read_doubles (is, data, LS_U_LONG, count, swap, flt_fmt);
> -#endif
>        break;
>  
>      case miMATRIX:
> @@ -230,15 +227,11 @@
>        break;
>  
>      case miINT64:
> -#ifdef int64_t
>        READ_INTEGER_DATA (int64_t, swap, m, 8, count, is);
> -#endif
>        break;
>  
>      case miUINT64:
> -#ifdef int64_t
>        READ_INTEGER_DATA (uint64_t, swap, m, 8, count, is);
> -#endif
>        break;
>  
>      case miMATRIX:
> @@ -1104,13 +1097,9 @@
>       MAT5_DO_WRITE (uint32_t, data, nel, os);
>       break;
>       
> -     // provide for 64 bit ints, even though get_save_type does
> -     // not yet implement them
> -#ifdef int64_t
>        case LS_U_LONG:
>       MAT5_DO_WRITE (uint64_t, data, nel, os);
>       break;
> -#endif
>  
>        case LS_CHAR:
>       MAT5_DO_WRITE (int8_t, data, nel, os);
> @@ -1124,11 +1113,9 @@
>       MAT5_DO_WRITE (int32_t, data, nel, os);
>       break;
>  
> -#ifdef int64_t
>        case LS_LONG:
>       MAT5_DO_WRITE (int64_t, data, nel, os);
>       break;
> -#endif
>  
>        case LS_FLOAT:
>       MAT5_DO_WRITE (float, data, nel, os);
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:14:49 -0600
> From: Joe Koski <address@hidden>
> Subject: FW: Seg fault with test_sparse.m
> To: octave maintainers <address@hidden>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="US-ASCII"
> 
> on 8/21/06 8:37 PM, John W. Eaton at address@hidden wrote:
> 
> > Please try the follwoing patch to fix the problem with reading/writing
> > 64-bit data types in the MAT file format.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > jwe
> 
> John,
> 
> Success! I applied the patch, and now with "make check" I get
> 
>  test_io.m .............................................. PASS   66/66
> 
> and 
> 
> Summary:
> 
>   PASS   2346
>   FAIL      0
> 
> 1007 (of 1107) files have no tests
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:47:13 +0530
> From: Anmol Sethy <address@hidden>
> Subject: list wanted
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Hello
> 
> I was intersted in participating in octave development and wanted to 
> have the current
> list of project/features wanted in octave.
> Can i have it ?
> 
> Regards
> Anmol Sethy
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:33:49 +0200
> From: David Bateman <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m
> To: Joe Koski <address@hidden>
> Cc: octave maintainers <address@hidden>,      "John W.
>       Eaton" <address@hidden>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Joe Koski wrote:
> 
> >David,
> >
> >I applied the patches, and now "make check" shows no errors in test_sparse:
> >
> >test_sparse.m .......................................... PASS 1176/1176
> >
> >  
> >
> John,
> 
> Given that Joe has given the go ahead to the attached patch, can you
> apply it?
> 
> Regards
> David
> 
> 
> 2006-08-22  David Bateman  <address@hidden>
> 
>     * sparse-xpow.cc: Replace all uses of pow by std::pow.
>     (elem_pow): Simplify for two sparse matrices arguments.
> 
> 2006-08-22  David Bateman  <address@hidden>
> 
>     * build_sparse_tests.sh: Don't force conversion to sparse boolean
>     return type for string mapper functions.
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]