Re: moving toward a 3.0 release

[Dmitri A. Sergatskov]

On 9/27/06, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> Since it seems that calls to these functions are relatively complex,
> it would be nice to have another layer around the Fortran at the
> liboctave level so that if someone wanted to use this functionality in
> C++ they could do it more easily.  That is secondary to finding
> out the cause of the crash, but it might help to be able to call this
> code directly from a C++ program without all of Octave in the way.

I have a stupid question, why don't we use arpack++ then?

> jwe

Dmitri.
--


--
.