Re: Distribution-specific include paths for several versions of Octave

[John W. Eaton]

On  4-Dec-2006, Thomas Weber wrote:

| > If they don't use mkoctfile, then it might not hurt to 
| > force them to be aware of the version that they are using, and that
| > there is no stable API.  If they complain about that, then ask them to
| > assist in designing the stable API and doing the work necessary to
| > maintain it...
| 
| You don't really expect this to work, do you ;)

Sure.  If they complain, they get a response that should clearly tell
them why things are the way they are (someone has to do the work)
along with a suggestion that they could maybe help.  Why wouldn't that
work?

jwe