Re: Pre-compiled octave for Windows

[David Bateman]

Michael Goffioul wrote:
> 
> There is only one version of the DLL's, isn't it? Concerning
> octinterp.dll in bin/ dir and a different
> one in lib/ dir, I don't understand what you mean. The .lib and .dll
> files are coupled: the .lib file
> defines the symbols that are found in the .dll and is used at link time.
> So you need both of them
> (actually, the .lib files are only installed if you selected the
> "Development" package in the installer).

Ok, I'm not an expert on windows and missed this..

> Maybe it's simply due to NSIS, which forces you to explicitely accept
> the license
> when you define one in the NSI script (I didn't check yet). What is better:
> not showing any license page at installation, or showing a license when
> an accept button,
> even it doesn't really make sense?

Ask John what he prefers...

Regards
David