Re: Octave/Win32 update

[Michael Goffioul]

> It seems to me a lot of work to do to support this GPL requirement with
> a download, so I'd recommend taking the route of a written offer to
> supply the source code for the octave-forge supplied binaries on
> request, and try and convince the users to go and get the code itself
> elsewhere and just use Michael build scripts with this.
>   

If I read the GPL FAQ correctly, as long as you provide binary package 
on-line, you
must also provide the sources on-line (the GPL talks about FTP, but I 
guess it's the
same for HTTP). So, your proposal above doesn't comply with GPL.

Michael