[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: acscd.m failing
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: acscd.m failing |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:38:44 -0500 |
On 8-Feb-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| Daniel J Sebald wrote:
| > Make check either hangs or takes a very long time on the following:
| >
| > liboctave/dMatrix.cc ................................... PASS 6/6
| > scripts/elfun/acosd.m .................................. PASS 3/3
| > scripts/elfun/acotd.m .................................. PASS 3/3
| > scripts/elfun/acscd.m ..................................
| >
| > The acosd.m and acotd.m tests take a fraction of a second while the
| > acscd.m test sits for at least a half hour (I broke out of the
| > program) with CPU pegged at 100%. Not sure why cosecant should fail
| > while cotangent is fine. I tried following the fntests.m script but
| > it is somewhat convoluted.
| >
| > Dan
| >
| Very odd. I don't see this, the check goes straight through this section...
The tests for acscd are just
%!error(acscd())
%!error(acscd(1,2))
%!assert(acscd(0:10:90),180/pi*acsc(0:10:90),-10*eps)
so can you try evaluating the expressions
acscd(0:10:90),
180/pi*acsc(0:10:90)
and see which one of them is hanging? On my system acsc(0) returns
NaN + NaNi for 0, so maybe that is the problem case? Should we maybe
be avoiding this argument value in the tests?
jwe
- handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), (continued)
- handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), Shai Ayal, 2007/02/08
- Re: handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), John W. Eaton, 2007/02/08
- Re: handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- image limits, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- image limits, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/09
- Re: image limits, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/09
- Re: handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), Shai Ayal, 2007/02/08
- acscd.m failing, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: acscd.m failing, David Bateman, 2007/02/08
- Re: acscd.m failing,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: acscd.m failing, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: acscd.m failing, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/08
- Message not available
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/12
Re: 2.9.10, finally?, address@hidden, 2007/02/08
Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/02/08