[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New function proposal
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: New function proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:15:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
address@hidden wrote:
> > Michael,
> >
> > pipe needs changing as well. I think John needs to express what he wants
> > done and will accept in the code to here.
>
> I know "pipe" needs fixing as well, this was not my point here. If
> it's only about
> switching from list to cell array, then it's a single line change:
> declare file_ids
> as Cell of size (1,2).
>
> Michael.
>
Yes, it is a simple change, but where is pipe/popen2 used? Should we
take these usages into account or just rest on the position that lists
are deprecated and get rid of them? If we get rid of them should we use
a cell array or or something else? In this case it might be better to
just use two return values as there are only two elements in the lists.
There is no point doing the work, if John doesn't like the solution and
won't accept the code, so better that he makes some statement...
Cheers
David
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Re: New function proposal, (continued)
- RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/13
- Re: New function proposal,
David Bateman <=
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/13
- Re: New function proposal, Paul Kienzle, 2007/02/13
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/14
- Re: New function proposal, Michael Goffioul, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/15
RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/13
RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15