octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: packaging aesthetics


From: David Bateman
Subject: Re: packaging aesthetics
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:53:20 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921)

Paul Kienzle wrote:
>
> I find I'm bothered by the packaging directory structure since it
> doesn't feel natural to me.
>
> I would prefer a system which captures the 90%+ case easily, which is
> a set of m-files with a few decorations to tell the packaging system
> what the package contains.  In Debian, the package information is in
> subdirectory, which allows it to be easily added to an existing
> package.  This makes it particularly easy for those with existing
> Matlab packages to add support for Octave, assuming various other
> compatibilities are not a concern. It also allows the packaging to be
> done by someone other than the developer.  Keeping the compiled
> wrappers, supporting libraries, documentation and so on are separated
> from the rest would probably be best, but the impact of these is small
> so it doesn't matter much either way.
>
> Of course since I'm not offering up any patches this message should be
> given the weight it deserves 8-)
>
>     - Paul
>
>
Paul,

If I understand what you are proposing, is to have all files in the root
directory of a package be installed and the sub-directories get special
treatment. One of these sub-directories is a directory with the octave
packaging information. The goal of this is that existing toolbox of a
bunch of m-files can easily be converted to an octave-package..

However, the code I've seen almost always has some sort of sub-directory
structure for the code. Also when octave gets "@<class>" and "private"
directories, any package that includes them is also a special case. So
to me taking all of the package that is directly installed and moving it
to an inst/ directory is in fact a better long term compromise as it
also addresses the issues of sub-directories that need installing...

Frankly I don't think there will every be a packaging that is prefect
for all uses, and its all a bit of a compromise, but the compromise we
have really isn't too bad...

Cheers
David


-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]