[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New function proposal
|
From: |
David Bateman |
|
Subject: |
Re: New function proposal |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:28:24 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 15-Feb-2007, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | I do however see a number of defunct child processes, but that is no
> | different from the old popen2 function..
>
> Should we be calling waitpid for the child processes to clean them up?
>
> | I think this patch is good to go..
>
> OK, please check it in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jwe
>
>
Ok committed..
D.
- RE: RE: Re: New function proposal, (continued)
- RE: RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal,
David Bateman <=
- Re: New function proposal, Michael Goffioul, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, Michael Goffioul, 2007/02/17