Re: Updating glpk binding to GLPK 4.15

[address@hidden]

Ok, and what about LIPSOL?
As far as I understand from
http://plato.asu.edu/ftp/lpcom.html
LIPSOL       linprog in Matlab 7.0
lipsol is used in  MATLAB linprog
it's homepage is
http://www.caam.rice.edu/~zhang/lipsol/
and all links say LIPSOL if free.
Since it has connection to MATLAB (as his homepage says) I guess integrating
it to Octave will be not too hard.
So what do you think?
D.


John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> On 19-Feb-2007, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> | 
> | And is anything known about binding to lp_solve?
> | Octave 2.9.9 says "not implemented yet"
> 
> It has been in more or less the same state since July 1 1993 when I
> added the LPsolve.{h,cc} files.  I guess no one ever cared enough in
> the last 13-1/2 years to do the necessary work.  Maybe those files
> should be removed?
> 
> | However, in their sourseforge download page there is already something
> | related to Octave
> |
> https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=145213&package_id=159735
> 
> I was not aware of this.  I looked at the code and I don't think I
> would accept it as part of Octave as it is, but maybe someone would
> want to package it and/or put a pointer to it on the future package
> distribution site.  Oh yeah, we need someone to work on that too, as
> we discussed in this thread:
> 
> 
> http://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2007-February/001798.html
> 
> | And: is it possible to avoid 2 (it seems to me) very unconvinient things
> (as
> | far as I saw in Python wrapper):
> | 1) replace maximizing (default) by minimizing
> | 2) avoid default lb=[0 0 0 ... 0]?
> 
> Ask the person who wrote the interface.
> 
> jwe
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Updating-glpk-binding-to-GLPK-4.15-tf3250570.html#a9061019
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.