Re: on the glpk patch for octave

[John W. Eaton]

On  2-Mar-2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:

| I did not test test the patch with 4.14, but I trust it should work with
| 4.14.  I chose the preprocessor macro name as GLPK_PRE_4_15 for
| pragmatic reasons.  If it is well tested that the patch work with 4.14, I
| have nothing against changing the macro name to GLPK_PRE_4_14.

The patch does a feature test in the configure script, so the macro
name does not indicate that you are testing for a particular version
number, correct?  Instead of a version, the macro could be named
HAVE_GLPK_SOME_FEATURE, but what should "SOME_FEATURE" be?  Unless
someone can think of something significantly better, then we might as
well leave it as it is.

Thanks,

jwe