[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: graphics future
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: graphics future |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:47:10 -0400 |
On 26-Apr-2007, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
| OK, so there's another doll inside the Matryoshka, a 'v6' option. Apparently
| what John implemented is version 6 and must remain.
I see no need to intentionally implement obsolete interfaces and
keep them around as a maintenance headache. I don't think we have the
resources for that.
jwe
- Re: graphics future, (continued)
- Re: graphics future, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future (was: Re: color_radio_property implementation), Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future (was: Re: color_radio_property implementation), Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future (was: Re: color_radio_property implementation), Paul Kienzle, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future (was: Re: color_radio_property implementation), John W. Eaton, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future (was: Re: color_radio_property implementation), Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26