[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mex API changes for 64bit
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Mex API changes for 64bit |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:59:35 -0400 |
On 3-Jun-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| I don't really see the point. These options only really make sense if
| you are compiling the mex files on one platform and using them on
| another. Is this type of cross-compiling really useful with matlab/octave?
It could make sense if you only have a 64-bit version of Octave and
you want to try to build 32-bit MEX files that you can distribute in
binary form. But do we care about that?
jwe
Mex API changes for 64bit, John W. Eaton, 2007/06/02
Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, Christopher Hulbert, 2007/06/02
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, David Bateman, 2007/06/03
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, Christopher Hulbert, 2007/06/03
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, David Bateman, 2007/06/03
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, Christopher Hulbert, 2007/06/03
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, David Bateman, 2007/06/03
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, John W. Eaton, 2007/06/03
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, Christopher Hulbert, 2007/06/03
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, David Bateman, 2007/06/03
- Re: Mex API changes for 64bit, John W. Eaton, 2007/06/05