Re: Mex API changes for 64bit

[David Bateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
>   single precision data type

Just a question, since the double complex type has taken the name
"Complex" whereas normally it should have a name starting in "Z", what
would you call the single precision complex type? In any case, adding
the type itself is easy enough, its all the mixed operators and all of
the functions that currently accept double arrays that would also have
to be converted to accept single precision arrays where the real work
is.. Given increasing memory sizes, is this really worth it?

>   profiler
>   debugger
>   interpreter performance

What happened to the discussion on a tree walker evaluator? It seemed
that that was a great idea that might impact all three of these...

D.