Re: randlib licence

[Petr Gajdos]

Hello,
I have tryed to remove randlib from octave 2.9.12. Can please someone look at 
patch attached, if it's ok?

Have a nice day
Petr

Dne středa 13 červen 2007 00:20 jste napsal(a):
> On 12-Jun-2007, David Bateman wrote:
> | which makes the whole question moot. If the authors, as owners of the
> | copyright on the code, place the code in the public domain, I don't see
> | how an ACM restriction can apply. The only question I see is in the
> | statement "that we have written". If there is any code in randlib that
> | was not written by the authors, then it would default to the ACM license
> | as the only one under which you can distribute.. I don't believe this is
> | the case, so I think randlib is in the clear for incorporation in GPLed
> | software..
>
> I assumed that it is OK, but if there is a problem I suppose we could
> remove it now as I think the default random number generator is no
> longer the randlib one.
>
> jwe

octave-2.9.12_without-randlib.patch
Description: Text Data