Re: Code after sub-functions?

[Michael Goffioul]

On 8/24/07, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> is correct. This syntax is legal as Matlab doesn't require functions to
> be terminates with an "end" keyword, except when nested functions are
> used for the parent and nested functions. Octave only duplicates the
> previous syntax for sub-functions. So I'm afraid you have two issues
> here. Firstly the unexecuted code, and seconding do the nested functions
> make use of variables in the scope of the parent?

Yes. But I'm still not there yet. There's still a lot porting work to do on
my side (in JHandles). So I can't check if I have scoping problems.

Michael.