[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:39:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Shai Ayal wrote:
> After seening the very nice output produced by Kai's contourf
> function, I am beginning to doubt whether we really need to replace
> gnuplot with our own backend now that it can do arbitrary patches and
> colors.
>
There are no arbitrary patches in 3-D with gnuplot.. Lots of the other
specialized plots might have issues being implemented with gnuplot..
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?,
David Bateman <=
- Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Alexander Barth, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/16
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, kahacjde, 2007/10/17
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/17
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Berk Geveci, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/16