[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:48:43 -0500 |
On 9-Nov-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| meshc and surfc should get the same treatment..
OK, I made the change for these files as well.
BTW, why do they unconditionally set hold on without resetting it? Is
that correct?
jwe
- Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?, (continued)
- Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?, John W. Eaton, 2007/11/09
- Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?, David Bateman, 2007/11/09
- Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?, John W. Eaton, 2007/11/09
- Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?, David Bateman, 2007/11/09
- Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?, John W. Eaton, 2007/11/09
- Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?, David Bateman, 2007/11/09
Re: Why does "mesh " set surface "facecolor" to "none"?, Kai Habel, 2007/11/08