Re: Problem with __plt_get_axis_arg__.m

[Michael Goffioul]

On 12/4/07, Michael Goffioul <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 12/3/07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> > | This looks good. Why not do the same for all functions if it is faster..
> >
> > Seems fine to me.  I would certainly consider a patch.
>
> I'll try to come with a complete patch soon.

While trying to extend the patch to other objects, I noticed 2 things:
1) __patch__.m explicitely set clim of the axes: is this really needed?
2) image.m does not support property/value pairs in its argument; I'm
not going to work on that, so if anybody wants to do it...

Michael.