[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUD octave support
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: GUD octave support |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:48:54 -0500 |
On 7-Dec-2007, Nick Roberts wrote:
| > | The advantage of using something like:
| > |
| > | ^Z^ZFILENAME:LINENO
| > |
| > | is that it is unambiguous, as Octave would not normally output ^Z^Z and
| > | unlikely to change, so matching the regexp won't break.
| >
| > OK, I'd consider a patch. I think some other option name like
| > --gud-mode would make more sense than --fullname.
|
| I don't wan't to quibble about the option name except to note that other
| applications such as DDD, could use such output, and indeed already do in the
| case of GDB.
Does it even have to be a command-line option? Could it instead be a
function to call to set the display style for filenames in Octave's
debugging mode?
jwe
- GUD octave support, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/04
- Re: GUD octave support, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/05
- Re: GUD octave support, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/05
- Re: GUD octave support, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/05
- Re: GUD octave support, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/05
- Re: GUD octave support, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/07
- Re: GUD octave support,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: GUD octave support, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/08
- Re: GUD octave support, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/10
- Re: GUD octave support, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/10
- Re: GUD octave support, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/11
- Re: GUD octave support, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/11
- Re: GUD octave support, Shai Ayal, 2007/12/11
- Re: GUD octave support, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/11
- Re: GUD octave support, Shai Ayal, 2007/12/11
- Re: GUD octave support, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/11
- Re: GUD octave support, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/11